<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="article.css"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "ISO 12083:1994//DTD Article//EN" "article.dtd">
<article>
<front>
<title>Non-Noether symmetry of the modified Boussinesq equations</title>
<author>
	<fname>George</fname>
	<surname>Chavchanidze</surname>
</author>
<aff>
	<orgdiv>Department of Theoretical Physics</orgdiv>
	<orgname>A. Razmadze Institute of Mathematics</orgname>
	<street>1 Aleksidze Street</street>
	<city>Tbilisi</city>
	<postcode>0193</postcode>
	<country>Georgia</country>
</aff>
<abstract>
<title>Abstract</title>
<p>We investigate one-parameter non-Noether symmetry group of the modified Boussinesq equations
and show that this symmetry naturally yields infinite sequence of conservation laws.</p>
</abstract>
<supmatl>
<p>
	<emph>Keywords:</emph>
	<keyphras>Non-Noether symmetry</keyphras>,
	<keyphras>Conservation laws</keyphras>,
	<keyphras>Modified Boussinesq system</keyphras>
</p>
<p><emph>MSC 2000:</emph> 70H33; 70H06; 58J70; 53Z05; 35A30</p>
</supmatl>
</front>
<chapter>
<p>
In Hamiltonian systems, conservation laws are closely related to symmetries of evolutionary equations.
In case of modified Boussinesq hierarchy this relationship is especially tight as its entire infinite set of 
conservation laws forms a single involutive orbit of a simple one-parameter symmetry group.  
We discuss some geometric properties of this symmetry and show how 
its properties ensure involutivity of conservation laws.</p>
<p>
Recall that the modified Boussinesq system is formed by the following set of partial differential equations
<dformula id="e1">
u<inf>t</inf> = cv<inf>xx</inf> + u<inf>x</inf>v + uv<inf>x</inf><break/>
v<inf>t</inf> = − cu<inf>xx</inf> + uu<inf>x</inf> + kvv<inf>x</inf>
</dformula>
where <formula>u = u(x, t), v = v(x, t)</formula> are smooth functions on <formula>ℝ<sup>2</sup></formula>
subjected to zero boundary conditions <formula>u(±∞, t) = v(±∞, t) = 0</formula>, while <formula>c</formula> and <formula>k</formula> are some real constants.
In cases <formula>k = − 1</formula> and <formula>k = 3</formula> modified Boussinesq system has non-trivial 
bi-Hamiltonian structure that drastically simplifies analysis of the system in these sectors. 
The first case is described in <citeref rid="r2">[2]</citeref>,<citeref rid="r5">[5]</citeref>,<citeref rid="r6">[6]</citeref>,
while in the present paper we focus on the second sector and show that in case <formula>k = 3</formula> 
bi-Hamiltonian structure of modified Boussinesq system is related to non-Noether symmetry <citeref rid="r1">[1]</citeref> 
of equations <formref rid="e1">(1)</formref>.
Thus in case <formula>k = 3</formula> modified Boussinesq equations
<dformula id="e2">
u<inf>t</inf> = cv<inf>xx</inf> + u<inf>x</inf>v + uv<inf>x</inf><break/>
v<inf>t</inf> = − cu<inf>xx</inf> + uu<inf>x</inf> + 3vv<inf>x</inf>
</dformula>
can be rewritten in bi-Hamiltonian form
<dformula id="e3">
u<inf>t</inf> = W(dh ∧ du) = Ŵ(dĥ ∧ du)<break/>
v<inf>t</inf> = W(dh ∧ dv) = Ŵ(dĥ ∧ dv)
</dformula>
where <formula>W</formula> and <formula>Ŵ</formula> are compatible Poison bivector fields, i.e.
<dformula>
[W , W] = [W , Ŵ] = [Ŵ , Ŵ] = 0
</dformula>
defined as follows
<dformula id="e5">
W = <subform><roman>∫</roman><bottom>− ∞</bottom><top>+ ∞</top></subform> ½(A ∧ A<inf>x</inf> + B ∧ B<inf>x</inf>)dx<break/>
Ŵ = <subform><roman>∫</roman><bottom>− ∞</bottom><top>+ ∞</top></subform> (uB ∧ A<inf>x</inf> + vB ∧ B<inf>x</inf> − cA<inf>x</inf> ∧ B<inf>x</inf>)dx
</dformula>
Note that <formula>A, B</formula> are vector fields that for every smooth functional <formula>R = R(u)</formula> are defined
via variational derivatives 
<dformula>
A(R) = <fraction><num>δR</num><den>δu</den></fraction>,          B(R) = <fraction><num>δR</num><den>δv</den></fraction>.
</dformula>
Corresponding Hamiltonians in bi-Hamiltonian realization <formref rid="e3">(3)</formref> are 
<dformula>
h = ½<subform><roman>∫</roman><bottom>− ∞</bottom><top>+ ∞</top></subform> (u<sup>2</sup>v + v<sup>3</sup> + 2cuv<inf>x</inf>)dx<break/>
ĥ = ½<subform><roman>∫</roman><bottom>− ∞</bottom><top>+ ∞</top></subform> (u<sup>2</sup> + v<sup>2</sup>)dx
</dformula>
This bi-Hamiltonian structure is related to symmetry of equations <formref rid="e2">(2)</formref>, but before we proceed let
us remind that symmetry of evolutionary equations is given by the group of transformations
<dformula>
(u , v) ↦ (g(u) , g(v))</dformula>
which commutes with time evolution
<dformula id="e9">
<fraction><num>d</num><den>dt</den></fraction>g(u) = g(u<inf>t</inf>),          <fraction><num>d</num><den>dt</den></fraction>g(v) = g(v<inf>t</inf>)
</dformula>
In case of continuous one-parameter groups of transformation 
<dformula>
g(u) = e<sup>zL<inf>E</inf></sup>(u) = u + zL<inf>E</inf>u + ½z<sup>2</sup>(L<inf>E</inf>)<sup>2</sup>u + ⋯<break/>
g(v) = e<sup>zL<inf>E</inf></sup>(v) = v + zL<inf>E</inf>v + ½z<sup>2</sup>(L<inf>E</inf>)<sup>2</sup>v + ⋯
</dformula>
generated by some vector field <formula>E</formula>, relation <formref rid="e9">(9)</formref> gives rise to the following
conditions for the generator of symmetry <formula>E</formula>
<dformula id="e11">
E(u)<inf>t</inf> = cE(v)<inf>xx</inf> + E(u)<inf>x</inf>v + uE(v)<inf>x</inf> + u<inf>x</inf>E(v) + E(u)v<inf>x</inf><break/>
E(v)<inf>t</inf> = − cE(u)<inf>xx</inf> + uE(u)<inf>x</inf> + 3vE(v)<inf>x</inf> + E(u)u<inf>x</inf> + 3E(v)v<inf>x</inf>
</dformula>
Among solutions of equations <formref rid="e11">(11)</formref> there is one  important vector field —
the generator of non-Noether symmetry which has the following form
<dformula id="e12">
E = <subform><roman>∫</roman><bottom>− ∞</bottom><top>+ ∞</top></subform> 
{[xuv + 2t(u<sup>3</sup> + 3uv<sup>2</sup> + 6cvv<inf>x</inf> − 2c<sup>2</sup>u<inf>xx</inf>)]A<inf>x</inf> − cxvA<inf>xx</inf><break/>
+ (xuu<inf>x</inf> + xvv<inf>x</inf>)B + 
[xu<sup>2</sup> + 2xv<sup>2</sup> + 2t(5v<sup>3</sup> + 3u<sup>2</sup>v − 6cvu<inf>x</inf> − 2c<sup>2</sup>v<inf>xx</inf>)]B<inf>x</inf><break/>
+ cxuB<inf>xx</inf>}dx
</dformula>
Applying one-parameter group of transformations 
<dformula>
g(z) = e<sup>zL<inf>E</inf></sup>
</dformula>
generated by the vector field <formula>E</formula> to the centre of Poisson algebra 
which in our case is formed by functional 
<dformula>
J = <subform><roman>∫</roman><bottom>− ∞</bottom><top>+ ∞</top></subform> (ku + mv)dx
</dformula>
where <formula>k, m</formula> are arbitrary constants, produces one-parameter family of functions
<dformula id="e15">
J(z) = e<sup>zL<inf>E</inf></sup>J = J + zL<inf>E</inf>J
+ ½(zL<inf>E</inf>)<sup>2</sup>J + ⋯
</dformula>
(actually this is the orbit of non-Noether symmetry group that passes centre of Poisson algebra).
It is interesting that the functionals <formula>(L<inf>E</inf>)<sup>m</sup>J</formula> are in involution.
</p>
<p><emph>Theorem.</emph> 
The orbit <formref rid="e15">(15)</formref> of the non-Noether symmetry group 
generated by the vector field <formref rid="e12">(12)</formref> is involutive
<dformula>
{J(x) , J(y)} = 0          ∀x, y ∈ ℝ
</dformula>
and the functionals
<dformula id="e17">
J<sup>(m)</sup> = (L<inf>E</inf>)<sup>m</sup>J
</dformula>
form Lenard scheme with respect to bi-Hamiltonian structure <formref rid="e5">(5)</formref>
and produce involutive sequence of conservation laws of the modified Boussinesq hierarchy.
</p>
<p><emph>Proof.</emph> 
The theorem follows from simple geometric properties of the vector field <formula>E</formula>. 
In particular taking the Lie derivative of Poisson bivector field 
<formula>W</formula> along <formula>E</formula> one gets the second Poisson bivector involved in bi-Hamiltonian system <formref rid="e5">(5)</formref> 
<dformula>
Ŵ = [E , W]
</dformula>
while the Lie derivative of <formula>Ŵ</formula> along <formula>E</formula> vanishes <formula>[E , Ŵ] = 0</formula>
These properties ensure that the functionals <formref rid="e17">(17)</formref> are in involution 
(the Poisson bracket of arbitrary two conservation laws from infinite family <formref rid="e17">(17)</formref> vanishes)
<dformula>
{J<sup>(k)</sup> , J<sup>(m)</sup>} = 0          k, m = 0, 1, 2 ...
</dformula>
Indeed, by applying  <formula>m</formula>-th order Lie derivative <formula>(L<inf>E</inf>)<sup>m</sup></formula> to the relation
<dformula>
W(dJ<sup>(0)</sup>) = 0
</dformula> 
which reflects the fact that <formula>J<sup>(0)</sup></formula> belongs to the centre of Poisson algebra,
its easy to prove that the functionals <formref rid="e17">(17)</formref> form Lenard scheme 
<dformula>
W(dJ<sup>(m + 1)</sup>) = − (1 + m)[E , W](dJ<sup>(m)</sup>)
</dformula>
with respect to bi-Hamiltonian system <formref rid="e5">(5)</formref>
From the other hand it is well known <citeref rid="r4">[4]</citeref> that functionals involved in Lenard scheme are
in involution. In the same time calculating the functional 
<dformula>
J<sup>(2)</sup> = (L<inf>E</inf>)<sup>2</sup>J<sup>(0)</sup> = m<subform><roman>∫</roman><bottom>− ∞</bottom><top>+ ∞</top></subform> (u<sup>2</sup>v + v<sup>3</sup> + 2cuv<inf>x</inf>)dx = 2mH
</dformula>
gives rise to Hamiltonian of the modified Boussinesq system and 
functionals <formula>J<sup>(m)</sup></formula> being in involution with Hamiltonian must be conservation laws.
 ∎</p>
<p>
By calculating Lie derivatives of <formula>J<sup>(0)</sup></formula> along the vector field <formula>E</formula> one can 
get explicit form of the conservation laws of the modified Boussinesq system:
<dformula id="e14">
J<sup>(0)</sup> = <subform><roman>∫</roman><bottom>− ∞</bottom><top>+ ∞</top></subform> (ku + mv)dx<break/>
J<sup>(1)</sup> = L<inf>E</inf>J<sup>(0)</sup> = <fraction><num>m</num><den>2</den></fraction><subform><roman>∫</roman><bottom>− ∞</bottom><top>+ ∞</top></subform>(u<sup>2</sup> + v<sup>2</sup>)dx<break/>
J<sup>(2)</sup> = (L<inf>E</inf>)<sup>2</sup>J<sup>(0)</sup> = m<subform><roman>∫</roman><bottom>− ∞</bottom><top>+ ∞</top></subform> (u<sup>2</sup>v + v<sup>3</sup> + 2cuv<inf>x</inf>)dx<break/>
J<sup>(3)</sup> = (L<inf>E</inf>)<sup>3</sup>J<sup>(0)</sup> = 
<fraction><num>3m</num><den>4</den></fraction><subform><roman>∫</roman><bottom>− ∞</bottom><top>+ ∞</top></subform> (u<sup>4</sup> + 5v<sup>4</sup> + 6u<sup>2</sup>v<sup>2</sup><break/>
 − 12cv<sup>2</sup>u<inf>x</inf> + 4c<sup>2</sup>u<inf>x</inf><sup>2</sup> + 4c<sup>2</sup>v<inf>x</inf><sup>2</sup>)dx<break/>
J<sup>(m)</sup> = (L<inf>E</inf>)<sup>m</sup>J<sup>(0)</sup> = L<inf>E</inf>J<sup>(m − 1)</sup>
</dformula>
</p>
<p><emph>Summary.</emph> 
The fact that the infinite sequence of conservation laws of modified Boussinesq hierarchy
form single orbit of the one-parameter non-Noether symmetry group indicates that
non-Noether symmetries may play an important role in analysis of certain integrable
models where they drastically simplify calculation of conservation laws and shed more 
light on geometric origin of integrable hierarchies. Basic results of the paper can be extended
to the case of periodic boundary conditions <formula>u(− ∞) = u(+ ∞)</formula> and <formula>v(− ∞) = v(+ ∞)</formula>
when the modified Boussinesq equations can be considered as bi-Hamiltonian system on a loop space
<citeref rid="r4">[4]</citeref>. Note however that in the periodic case the symmetry <formref rid="e12">(12)</formref> does not seem to
preserve boundary conditions.
</p>
</chapter>
<back>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgements</title>
<p>The research described in this publication was made possible in part by
Award No. GEP1-3327-TB-03 of  the Georgian Research and Development Foundation 
(GRDF) and the 
U.S. Civilian Research &amp; Development Foundation for the 
Independent States of the Former Soviet Union (CRDF).</p>
</ack>

<biblist>
<head>References</head>
<citation id="r1">
	<title>Non-Noether symmetries and their influence on phase space geometry</title>
	<author>
		<fname>G.</fname>
		<surname>Chavchanidze</surname>
	</author>
	<othinfo>J. Geom. Phys. 48, 190-202</othinfo>
	<date>2003</date>
</citation>
<citation id="r2">
	<title>Factorization of operators. II</title>
	<author>
		<fname>A.</fname>
		<surname>Fordy</surname>
	</author>
	<author>
		<fname>J.</fname>
		<surname>Gibbons</surname>
	</author>
	<othinfo>J. Math. Phys. 22, No. 6, 1170–1175</othinfo>
	<date>1981</date>
</citation>
<citation id="r3">
	<title>A simple model of the integrable Hamiltonian equation</title>
	<author>
		<fname>F.</fname>
		<surname>Magri</surname>
	</author>
	<othinfo>J. Math. Phys. 19 No. 5, 1156-1162</othinfo>
	<date>1978</date>
</citation>
<citation id="r4">
	<title>Symplectic and Poisson Geometry on Loop Spaces of Smooth Manifolds and Integrable Equations</title>
	<author>
		<fname>O.</fname>
		<surname>Mokhov</surname>
	</author>
	<corpauth>
		<orgname>Routledge</orgname>
	</corpauth>
	<date>2004</date>
</citation>
<citation id="r5">
	<title>A list of 1 + 1 dimensional integrable equations and their properties</title>
	<author>
		<fname>J.P.</fname>
		<surname>Wang</surname>
	</author>
	<othinfo>J. Nonlinear Math. Phys. 9, suppl. 1, 213–233</othinfo>
	<date>2002</date>
</citation>
<citation id="r6">
	<title>Symmetries and conservation laws of evolution equations</title>
	<author>
		<fname>J.P.</fname>
		<surname>Wang</surname>
	</author>
	<corpauth>
		<orgname>Vrije Universiteit van Amsterdam</orgname>
	</corpauth>
	<othinfo>Ph.D. Thesis</othinfo>
	<date>1998</date>
</citation>
</biblist>
</back>
</article>